Triple

T28038604
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Atlas E708476 entity
Predicate antagonistInFiction P18963 FINISHED
Object GLaDOS NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: GLaDOS | Statement: [Atlas, antagonistInFiction, GLaDOS]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: antagonistInFiction
Context triple: [Atlas, antagonistInFiction, GLaDOS]
  • A. antagonistOf chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • B. antagonistActorRole
    Indicates that an actor plays the role of an antagonist in a given work or context.
  • C. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • D. antagonistStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds an opposing or adversarial role, often acting as the main source of conflict relative to another entity or objective.
  • E. antagonistBaseOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary base, headquarters, or stronghold from which an antagonist operates or exerts influence over another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef9b6cf538819094a633ffa67afec1 completed April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f63f2e1a248190a41f02f91e8c1183 completed May 2, 2026, 6:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f63710d17c819084cfe96e6df334fd completed May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m.