Triple
T27994802
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Liga TDP |
E706980
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasYouthDevelopmentObjective |
P111521
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Liga TDP, hasYouthDevelopmentObjective, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasYouthDevelopmentObjective Context triple: [Liga TDP, hasYouthDevelopmentObjective, true]
-
A.
youthAcademyFocus
Indicates that an organization or program is primarily dedicated to developing and training young or junior participants.
-
B.
hasJuniorDevelopmentFocus
chosen
Indicates that an entity is oriented toward or primarily concerned with junior-level development activities or responsibilities.
-
C.
usesYouthAcademyPipeline
Indicates that an organization develops and promotes players through its own youth academy system as a primary source of talent.
-
D.
hasYouthTeam
Indicates that an entity has an associated youth team that serves as its junior or developmental squad.
-
E.
youthPlayer
Indicates a relationship where an individual is a member of, or plays for, the youth or junior division of a team, club, or organization.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b980d88190a753b2f9a978595a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f643ed0b7481908cf25f3afec0a61d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641def1e88190a05bf865ced78b23 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:52 p.m.