Triple
T2796436
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pro Display XDR |
E53046
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsMacCompatibility |
P13398
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Pro Display XDR, supportsMacCompatibility, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsMacCompatibility Context triple: [Pro Display XDR, supportsMacCompatibility, true]
-
A.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
-
B.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
C.
hasSoftwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one software system can operate correctly and effectively with another software system, without conflicts or required modifications.
-
D.
compatibilityNote
Indicates that there is an explanatory note or comment about how well two entities are compatible or work together.
-
E.
supportedSystem
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility, functionality, or operational support for another system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495a90788190941b6917e1eca3a6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abddef754081908e6218dc2208e0fd |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd040f9481908e9c7a2df88ea1ae |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:58 p.m.