Triple
T27922236
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judiciary of The Bahamas |
E706235
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealToPrivyCouncilFrom |
P1031
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Court of Appeal of The Bahamas |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Court of Appeal of The Bahamas | Statement: [Judiciary of The Bahamas, appealToPrivyCouncilFrom, Court of Appeal of The Bahamas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealToPrivyCouncilFrom Context triple: [Judiciary of The Bahamas, appealToPrivyCouncilFrom, Court of Appeal of The Bahamas]
-
A.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
B.
hearsAppealTo
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
-
C.
appealsFrom
chosen
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
D.
centralAppeal
Indicates that something serves as the main attraction, focus, or compelling feature that draws interest or attention.
-
E.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b6cc808190aab19fb18b235f4b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6df450014819099d118e5c2d697fa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de07836481908785cde9c511920b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:57 p.m.