Triple
T279048
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crimean Khanate |
E5313
|
entity |
| Predicate | founder |
P104
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hacı I Giray |
E36720
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hacı I Giray | Statement: [Crimean Khanate, founder, Hacı I Giray]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hacı I Giray Context triple: [Crimean Khanate, founder, Hacı I Giray]
-
A.
Murad Bey
Murad Bey was a prominent Mamluk military leader and ruler in late 18th-century Egypt who fiercely resisted Napoleon’s invasion.
-
B.
Giray
chosen
The Giray were the hereditary ruling dynasty of the Crimean Khanate, a prominent Turkic-Mongol royal house that claimed descent from Genghis Khan.
-
C.
Murad I
Murad I was a 14th-century Ottoman sultan who significantly expanded Ottoman territories in the Balkans and Anatolia, laying key foundations for the empire’s rise.
-
D.
Bayezid I
Bayezid I was a late 14th-century Ottoman sultan known for rapidly expanding the empire into the Balkans and Anatolia before his defeat and capture by Timur at the Battle of Ankara.
-
E.
Osman I
Osman I was the founder and first ruler of the Ottoman dynasty, which grew into one of history’s most powerful empires.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257e6c8788190987dfe705ca2912a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25def95c48190bb8ab2259f67b583 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a39d04650c8190bda8f1b982c645df |
completed | March 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:59 a.m.