Triple
T27888787
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zab protocol |
E705296
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | atomic broadcast protocol |
C41035
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: atomic broadcast protocol Context triple: [Zab protocol, instanceOf, atomic broadcast protocol]
-
A.
fault-tolerant consensus protocol
A fault-tolerant consensus protocol is a distributed algorithm that enables a group of nodes to reliably agree on a shared state or value even when some nodes fail or behave maliciously.
-
B.
distributed consensus algorithm
chosen
A distributed consensus algorithm is a protocol that enables a group of independent, networked nodes to reliably agree on a single shared value or state, even in the presence of failures or unreliable communication.
-
C.
Algorand protocol feature
An Algorand protocol feature is a specific built-in capability or mechanism of the Algorand blockchain that enhances its security, scalability, consensus, or smart contract functionality.
-
D.
broadcast set
A broadcast set is a collection of media content or programs scheduled and transmitted together over a broadcast channel to reach an audience.
-
E.
broadcast transmission operator
A broadcast transmission operator is responsible for setting up, monitoring, and adjusting the technical equipment that sends audio and video signals from a studio or control room to broadcast, cable, or streaming distribution systems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b39c448190a9b3aa6672a5168f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:34 p.m.