Triple
T27845988
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Qeshm County |
E703820
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStrategicLocationNear |
P192131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Strait of Hormuz |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Strait of Hormuz | Statement: [Qeshm County, hasStrategicLocationNear, Strait of Hormuz]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStrategicLocationNear Context triple: [Qeshm County, hasStrategicLocationNear, Strait of Hormuz]
-
A.
strategicLocation
Indicates that an entity is positioned in a place of particular tactical or strategic importance relative to goals, resources, or other entities.
-
B.
hasTribalHeadquartersNearby
Indicates that the subject entity is located close to the tribal headquarters of a Native nation or tribe.
-
C.
hasFortificationNearby
Indicates that one entity is located in proximity to, or within the immediate area of, a fortification structure associated with it.
-
D.
hasRegionalCenterNearby
Indicates that a regional center is located in close proximity to the referenced entity.
-
E.
hasProtectedAreasNearby
Indicates that an entity is located close to one or more designated protected or conservation areas.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef840d9e3c819093615ebff4ec22be |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcf82405c88190a19cecf8e9cc272d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:07 p.m.