Triple
T27806624
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Seibel 5656 |
E702394
|
entity |
| Predicate | breeder |
P24704
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Albert Seibel
Albert Seibel was a French viticulturist and grape breeder known for developing numerous hybrid grape varieties used in wine production.
|
E1800491
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albert Seibel | Statement: [Seibel 5656, breeder, Albert Seibel]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Albert Seibel Triple: [Seibel 5656, breeder, Albert Seibel]
Generated description
Albert Seibel was a French viticulturist and grape breeder known for developing numerous hybrid grape varieties used in wine production.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef8408e0588190977cffa32dc33a29 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6383a516881908911b4974797b8e7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a15b87a7d448190a9f044ca2e23b9f4 |
completed | May 26, 2026, 3:12 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a15bcca3074819084e5661a3616cbfc |
completed | May 26, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a15bd774d4c819093f2999c2ae8e52e |
completed | May 26, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:39 p.m.