Triple
T27756702
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tinker substantial disruption test |
E701351
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | student speech doctrine |
C12743
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: student speech doctrine Context triple: [Tinker substantial disruption test, instanceOf, student speech doctrine]
-
A.
student free speech activist
A student free speech activist is an individual, typically enrolled in an educational institution, who organizes, advocates, and campaigns to protect and expand the rights of students to express their ideas and opinions without undue censorship or punishment.
-
B.
free speech case
A free speech case is a legal dispute that centers on whether an individual’s or group’s expression is protected under constitutional or statutory guarantees of freedom of speech.
-
C.
freedom of expression law
chosen
Freedom of expression law is the body of legal rules and principles that define, protect, and limit individuals’ rights to express ideas, opinions, and information through various forms of communication.
-
D.
religious freedom law
Religious freedom law is a legal framework that protects individuals’ and groups’ rights to hold, practice, change, or abstain from religious beliefs without undue interference or discrimination by the state or others.
-
E.
student debating society
A student debating society is an organized group within an educational institution where students regularly practice and develop argumentation, public speaking, and critical thinking skills through structured debates on various topics.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a5193808190816eb7d0020b2d87 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:24 p.m.