Triple

T277401
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SAS E5277 entity
Predicate supportsFunctionality P203 FINISHED
Object data extraction transformation and loading (ETL) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: data extraction transformation and loading (ETL) | Statement: [SAS, supportsFunctionality, data extraction transformation and loading (ETL)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsFunctionality
Context triple: [SAS, supportsFunctionality, data extraction transformation and loading (ETL)]
  • A. supportsFeature chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
  • B. featuresSupporter
    Indicates that one entity serves as a supporter, advocate, or promoter of another entity or its cause.
  • C. supportsActivity
    Indicates that one entity provides the necessary conditions, resources, or environment for another entity’s activity to occur or be sustained.
  • D. supportsPolicy
    Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
  • E. typeOfSupport
    Indicates the kind or category of assistance, help, or backing provided in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257e6c8788190987dfe705ca2912a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25ded68c88190b1fc595ce329aeb9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b7480e881909399beccfc7ffb81 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:59 a.m.