Triple
T277369
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SAS |
E5277
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsProgrammingParadigm |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | procedural programming |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: procedural programming | Statement: [SAS, supportsProgrammingParadigm, procedural programming]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsProgrammingParadigm Context triple: [SAS, supportsProgrammingParadigm, procedural programming]
-
A.
programmingLanguage
Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to create, control, or interact with the other entity.
-
B.
programming
Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or modifies software or code, typically using a programming language to create or control computer programs.
-
C.
supportsProjectType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
programType
Indicates the category or kind of program to which an entity belongs or with which it is associated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257e6c8788190987dfe705ca2912a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25ded68c88190b1fc595ce329aeb9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b7480e881909399beccfc7ffb81 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:59 a.m.