Triple

T27726136
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frederick I, Count of Mark E699100 entity
Predicate feudalLordType P57399 FINISHED
Object imperial count LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: imperial count | Statement: [Frederick I, Count of Mark, feudalLordType, imperial count]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: feudalLordType
Context triple: [Frederick I, Count of Mark, feudalLordType, imperial count]
  • A. feudalType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of feudal relationship, structure, or tenure that applies between the related entities.
  • B. feudType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of ongoing conflict or long-standing hostility that exists between entities.
  • C. feudalFunction
    Indicates the role or duty an entity holds within a feudal hierarchy, such as obligations, services, or functions owed to or performed for another.
  • D. feudalTitleOver
    Indicates a hierarchical feudal relationship in which one party holds formal title-based authority or overlordship over another.
  • E. typeOfFeudalGrant
    Indicates the specific kind or category of feudal grant that characterizes the relationship between a grantor and a grantee within a feudal system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef591012dc8190a6f1ec994f9f7ff7 completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6364042dc8190a2dc2133ec220baa completed May 2, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f63188e7408190af8ce8b93d128c63 completed May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:09 p.m.