Triple
T27709246
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Texas (1950) |
E698632
|
entity |
| Predicate | areaInDispute |
P15542
|
FINISHED |
| Object | submerged lands off the coast of Texas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: submerged lands off the coast of Texas | Statement: [United States v. Texas (1950), areaInDispute, submerged lands off the coast of Texas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areaInDispute Context triple: [United States v. Texas (1950), areaInDispute, submerged lands off the coast of Texas]
-
A.
associatedTerritoryDispute
Indicates that there is a territorial dispute or contested claim connected to the referenced entity or relationship.
-
B.
locatedInDisputedTerritory
chosen
Indicates that an entity is situated within a geographic area whose sovereignty or ownership is contested between two or more parties.
-
C.
borderDisputesWith
Indicates that there are contested or unresolved boundary claims between two entities.
-
D.
frontierDispute
Indicates a conflict or disagreement between entities over the location, control, or status of a shared boundary or border.
-
E.
borderDisputeResolvedBy
Indicates that a previously contested border between entities has been settled or resolved through the specified agent, process, or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590f655c81909f93893b3b3219b2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f635caa4d0819091567f73ea78b8a0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1a92648190835a2c5250d8c758 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:01 p.m.