Triple
T27709236
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Texas (1950) |
E698632
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal–state boundary dispute case |
C14474
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: federal–state boundary dispute case Context triple: [United States v. Texas (1950), instanceOf, federal–state boundary dispute case]
-
A.
federal jurisdiction case
chosen
A federal jurisdiction case is a legal dispute that is heard in a federal court because it involves federal laws, the U.S. Constitution, the federal government, or parties from different states meeting specific jurisdictional requirements.
-
B.
maritime boundary delimitation case
A maritime boundary delimitation case is a legal dispute or proceeding in which states seek the determination or adjustment of their respective maritime zones and boundaries, such as territorial seas, exclusive economic zones, and continental shelves, in accordance with international law.
-
C.
state border
A state border is a legally defined geographic boundary that separates the territory and jurisdiction of one state from another.
-
D.
disputed territory
A disputed territory is a geographic area over which two or more parties claim sovereignty or control, without mutual agreement on its legal or political status.
-
E.
border conflict
A border conflict is a dispute between neighboring states or groups over the ownership, control, or demarcation of a shared territorial boundary.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590f655c81909f93893b3b3219b2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:01 p.m.