Triple
T27689979
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kevin Parker |
E698131
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCreativeForceBehind |
P72567
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tame Impala |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tame Impala | Statement: [Kevin Parker, isCreativeForceBehind, Tame Impala]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCreativeForceBehind Context triple: [Kevin Parker, isCreativeForceBehind, Tame Impala]
-
A.
isCreativeProfessionalIn
Indicates that an entity works in a professional capacity involving creative skills or artistic work within a specified domain, organization, or context.
-
B.
hasCreativeLeader
Indicates that an entity is led or directed in its creative aspects by a specific person or organization.
-
C.
isCreativePlaymaker
Indicates that an entity plays a central role in inventively creating opportunities or setting up actions for others.
-
D.
keyCreativeForceIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary driving or originating creative influence behind another entity (such as a work, project, or initiative).
-
E.
creativeInfluence
Indicates that one entity has shaped, inspired, or informed the creative work, style, or ideas of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef590df8708190af5488f0638e790c |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63894e5848190aec428392562ab06 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6370c8c7c8190a02ea82847bb6e76 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.