Triple
T276283
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Queen City of the Trails |
E5255
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesSince |
P2935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 19th century context of westward trails |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 19th century context of westward trails | Statement: [Queen City of the Trails, appliesSince, 19th century context of westward trails]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesSince Context triple: [Queen City of the Trails, appliesSince, 19th century context of westward trails]
-
A.
appliesAt
Indicates that an action, rule, or condition is relevant to or in effect at a specific location, context, or point in time.
-
B.
introducedAfter
Indicates that one entity was introduced at a later time or stage than another entity.
-
C.
doesNotApplyRetroactivelyTo
Indicates that a rule, law, or condition does not affect events, actions, or situations that occurred before it came into effect.
-
D.
appliesTo
Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
-
E.
usedSince
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been in use starting from a specified point in time and continuing thereafter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257e6c8788190987dfe705ca2912a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25dec53ac8190912f3d79576131fa |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b7480e881909399beccfc7ffb81 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:59 a.m.