Triple
T2754
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lee de Forest |
E51
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInfluenced |
P9
|
FINISHED |
| Object | development of modern electronics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: development of modern electronics | Statement: [Lee de Forest, hasInfluenced, development of modern electronics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInfluenced Context triple: [Lee de Forest, hasInfluenced, development of modern electronics]
-
A.
influenced
chosen
Indicates that one entity has affected, shaped, or altered another entity’s state, behavior, or characteristics.
-
B.
notableFor
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
-
C.
hasRepresentationIn
Indicates that one entity is represented, depicted, or encoded within another entity, such as a concept, object, or data structure having a corresponding representation in a specific medium or context.
-
D.
participatedInEvent
Indicates that an entity took part in or was actively involved in a specific event.
-
E.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a22e0d37588190897cf37a323013f5 |
completed | Feb. 27, 2026, 11:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a23344daf8819083118bbac5f46568 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a232e52e7c81909c072703e28e8c61 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:12 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 27, 2026, 11:55 p.m.