Triple

T27535377
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Truro E695080 entity
Predicate cathedralProvince P162484 FINISHED
Object Province of Canterbury NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Province of Canterbury | Statement: [Truro, cathedralProvince, Province of Canterbury]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cathedralProvince
Context triple: [Truro, cathedralProvince, Province of Canterbury]
  • A. cathedralChurch
    Indicates that one church serves as the cathedral (principal church and episcopal seat) of another ecclesiastical jurisdiction or entity.
  • B. hasProCathedral
    Indicates that one entity serves as or possesses a pro-cathedral (a church temporarily acting as a cathedral) in relation to another entity.
  • C. cathedralServed
    Indicates that one entity functioned in an official or service role for, or on behalf of, a cathedral.
  • D. cathedralRank
    Indicates that an entity holds the status or rank of a cathedral within an ecclesiastical or organizational hierarchy.
  • E. coCathedral
    Indicates that a church shares the status and functions of a cathedral with another cathedral within the same diocese or ecclesiastical jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef538608b081908b9f659bb09d5e0f completed April 27, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62f5996508190894a769a5199945d completed May 2, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f623ac3a9c8190a6ee0c137b09e4b0 completed May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f624c006788190a2f4d5015c96463f completed May 2, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:28 p.m.