Triple
T27369830
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Andrea Salinas |
E690280
|
entity |
| Predicate | legislative priority |
P8905
|
FINISHED |
| Object | expanding access to the ballot |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expanding access to the ballot | Statement: [Andrea Salinas, legislative priority, expanding access to the ballot]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legislative priority Context triple: [Andrea Salinas, legislative priority, expanding access to the ballot]
-
A.
significantLegislation
Indicates that a piece of legislation has substantial importance or impact within a legal, political, or social context.
-
B.
hasLegislativeSubject
chosen
Indicates that a legislative document, action, or body concerns, addresses, or is about a particular subject or topic.
-
C.
legislativeImpact
Indicates the effect that a law or legislative action has on a policy, entity, or outcome.
-
D.
coordinatesLegislativeStrategyFor
Indicates that one entity plans, directs, or manages the legislative strategy on behalf of another entity.
-
E.
nationalLegislation
Indicates that an entity is a law or legal measure enacted at the national level by a country’s central legislative authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef51ff826081909e42c8e2bfb97941 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64dbbaefc8190952b8320bf4397d8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64cacd2c08190aed8a1761d0da679 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:18 p.m.