Triple
T27367634
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Douglas County, Missouri |
E690212
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsWatercourse |
P16952
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Bryant Creek
Bryant Creek is a river in southern Missouri known for its clear waters, scenic Ozark landscapes, and opportunities for fishing and paddling.
|
E2292222
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bryant Creek | Statement: [Douglas County, Missouri, containsWatercourse, Bryant Creek]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Bryant Creek Triple: [Douglas County, Missouri, containsWatercourse, Bryant Creek]
Generated description
Bryant Creek is a river in southern Missouri known for its clear waters, scenic Ozark landscapes, and opportunities for fishing and paddling.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef51ff826081909e42c8e2bfb97941 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62c5e56308190ac70a89734a7cbcb |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:54 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a5cd53a5e308190882815ce91e0eacc |
completed | July 19, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a5cd5ab7a0c8190aebf4108f4400ef6 |
completed | July 19, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a5cd627f58c8190b1511b8ba858f69a |
completed | July 19, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:17 p.m.