Triple

T27361044
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Manderson, South Dakota E685823 entity
Predicate reservationJurisdiction P105709 FINISHED
Object Oglala Sioux Tribe NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oglala Sioux Tribe | Statement: [Manderson, South Dakota, reservationJurisdiction, Oglala Sioux Tribe]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reservationJurisdiction
Context triple: [Manderson, South Dakota, reservationJurisdiction, Oglala Sioux Tribe]
  • A. claimsJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or governing body asserts legal power or control over a particular area, matter, or entity.
  • B. reservationOrJurisdiction chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity either holds formal authority over a domain (jurisdiction) or has a reserved right or claim to it (reservation).
  • C. definedJurisdictionOf
    Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
  • D. usesJurisdiction
    Indicates that one entity applies or operates under the legal authority or rules of a particular jurisdiction.
  • E. jurisdictionOfTribunal
    Indicates the legal authority or scope within which a particular tribunal is empowered to hear and decide cases.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef14887c288190931b8431fdbf53c4 completed April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62c23b91c8190a430caf3791f932e completed May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f623a91b9c8190b2e2fdbc55cb89b6 completed May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:53 a.m.