Triple

T2733736
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Socratic dialogues of Plato E60378 entity
Predicate featuresCharacter P626 FINISHED
Object Protagoras E88225 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Protagoras | Statement: [Socratic dialogues of Plato, featuresCharacter, Protagoras]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Protagoras
Context triple: [Socratic dialogues of Plato, featuresCharacter, Protagoras]
  • A. Protagoras chosen
    Protagoras was a pre-Socratic Greek sophist and philosopher best known for his relativistic claim that "man is the measure of all things."
  • B. Antisthenes
    Antisthenes was an ancient Greek philosopher, a pupil of Socrates and a key forerunner of Cynicism known for his advocacy of virtue, self-sufficiency, and ascetic living.
  • C. Gorgias
    Gorgias was a pre-Socratic Greek sophist and rhetorician renowned for his skillful, ornamental style of speech and his skeptical, paradoxical philosophical arguments.
  • D. Gorgias
    Gorgias is a Socratic dialogue by Plato that examines the nature of rhetoric, justice, and the good life through a debate between Socrates and the sophist Gorgias.
  • E. Anaxagoras
    Anaxagoras was a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher known for introducing the concept of Nous (Mind) as the cosmic ordering principle and for offering naturalistic explanations of celestial and physical phenomena.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4b75cd908190b691ef0d1801acda completed March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdaf175808190acbbb3873c7c3f67 completed March 7, 2026, 7:59 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69afc036a5f88190aeb828829356ef47 completed March 10, 2026, 6:54 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:56 p.m.