Triple
T27327397
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Runway 11L/29R |
E689692
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRunwayPosition |
P164319
|
FINISHED |
| Object | left for direction 11 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: left for direction 11 | Statement: [Runway 11L/29R, hasRunwayPosition, left for direction 11]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRunwayPosition Context triple: [Runway 11L/29R, hasRunwayPosition, left for direction 11]
-
A.
hasRunwayPresence
Indicates that an entity maintains a physical runway or landing strip suitable for aircraft operations.
-
B.
hasRunwayConfiguration
Indicates a specific arrangement or setup of runways associated with an airport, airfield, or similar facility.
-
C.
hasRunwayNumber
Indicates that an airport or airfield runway is assigned a specific identifying number.
-
D.
hasRunwaySide
Indicates that a runway is located on or associated with a particular side or boundary of another feature (such as an airport or airfield area).
-
E.
hasRunwayConfigurationRole
Indicates that an entity plays a specific functional role within a particular runway configuration.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef355d4cb08190ab032c0a2e7d3753 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f644de4a84819087ddb84757fc4585 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641dc8ff48190ab575d855616580c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f643e818d481908fc66bc91bd25d77 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:36 a.m.