Triple

T2720039
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Unami language E60059 entity
Predicate syntacticType P41847 FINISHED
Object head-marking language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: head-marking language | Statement: [Unami language, syntacticType, head-marking language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: syntacticType
Context triple: [Unami language, syntacticType, head-marking language]
  • A. grammaticalType
    Indicates the grammatical category or role (such as part of speech or syntactic function) that an expression has within a language.
  • B. semanticType
    Indicates that something belongs to or is categorized under a particular semantic class or type based on its meaning.
  • C. linguisticType
    Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
  • D. symbolType
    Indicates the classification or category of a symbol based on its role, form, or function within a given system.
  • E. syntaxBasedOn
    Indicates that the syntactic structure or rules of one entity are derived from, influenced by, or constructed according to the syntax of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4b746d248190958e052045c09255 completed March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdab06d388190acf690787fe58ab5 completed March 7, 2026, 7:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd8240920819087a812d816a55edb completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd949c120819099a9d56eb71a0339 completed March 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.