Triple
T27176407
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lyapunov condition |
E683054
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | condition for central limit theorem |
C26950
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: condition for central limit theorem Context triple: [Lyapunov condition, instanceOf, condition for central limit theorem]
-
A.
central limit theorem
The central limit theorem states that, under broad conditions, the sum (or average) of a large number of independent, identically distributed random variables tends to follow a normal distribution, regardless of the original variables’ distribution.
-
B.
quantitative central limit theorem
The quantitative central limit theorem provides explicit bounds on how quickly the distribution of normalized sums of random variables converges to the normal distribution, typically in terms of metrics like the Kolmogorov or Wasserstein distance.
-
C.
criterion for uniform convergence
A criterion for uniform convergence is a condition or set of conditions that allows one to determine whether a sequence (or series) of functions converges uniformly to a limiting function on a given domain.
-
D.
criterion for convergence
chosen
A criterion for convergence is a specific test or condition used to determine whether a given sequence or series approaches a finite limit as its index or number of terms increases.
-
E.
empirical rule
The empirical rule is a statistical guideline stating that for a normal distribution, approximately 68% of data fall within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% within two, and 99.7% within three.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefad086808190ab89816c0c300476 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:26 a.m.