Triple
T27168141
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Social law division of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court |
E682830
|
entity |
| Predicate | maySetPrecedent |
P75174
|
FINISHED |
| Object | for lower Swiss courts in social law matters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: for lower Swiss courts in social law matters | Statement: [Social law division of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, maySetPrecedent, for lower Swiss courts in social law matters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maySetPrecedent Context triple: [Social law division of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, maySetPrecedent, for lower Swiss courts in social law matters]
-
A.
claimedPrecedent
Indicates that one party asserts a prior case, decision, or example as a guiding or authoritative basis for the current situation or argument.
-
B.
modifiedPrecedent
Indicates that one entity has altered, qualified, or changed the terms, scope, or interpretation of a prior decision, rule, or precedent.
-
C.
createdInstitutionalPrecedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one action, decision, or event established a formal example or standard that later guided or constrained institutional behavior, rules, or practices for another.
-
D.
mayEnact
Indicates that an entity has the authority or permission to establish, implement, or put into effect a rule, policy, or action.
-
E.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eefacf6e788190a75a64399d9e3109 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62cd2ceb481908cd9fae52a542206 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c1762f881908c25e8f70ecd5041 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:22 a.m.