Triple

T2714535
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IRS-CI E59936 entity
Predicate specialAgentsHaveAuthority P26795 FINISHED
Object to execute search warrants LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: to execute search warrants | Statement: [IRS-CI, specialAgentsHaveAuthority, to execute search warrants]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: specialAgentsHaveAuthority
Context triple: [IRS-CI, specialAgentsHaveAuthority, to execute search warrants]
  • A. enforcementAgency
    Indicates that one entity serves as the authority responsible for enforcing laws, rules, or regulations related to another entity.
  • B. hasLegalAuthorityFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
  • C. usesAuthorityOf
    Indicates that one entity exercises power, rights, or influence derived from or on behalf of another entity’s authority.
  • D. securityAgency
    Indicates that one entity functions as a security agency responsible for protection, surveillance, or enforcement activities in relation to another entity.
  • E. legalAuthorityOver
    Indicates that one entity has the recognized power or right to make, enforce, or adjudicate rules or decisions concerning another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac92a088190bc74bca14038e3de completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abda93a2388190b55a1c821ef6bc64 completed March 7, 2026, 7:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd8240920819087a812d816a55edb completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.