Triple
T271037
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Best Current Practice |
E5632
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesFormat |
P130
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC |
E5627
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC | Statement: [Best Current Practice, usesFormat, RFC]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC Context triple: [Best Current Practice, usesFormat, RFC]
-
A.
RFCs
chosen
RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
-
B.
RFC Editor
The RFC Editor is the organization responsible for editing, publishing, and maintaining the Request for Comments (RFC) series that documents standards and technical notes for the Internet community.
-
C.
RFC 855
RFC 855 is an Internet standards document that specifies the Telnet protocol’s options and mechanisms for remote terminal communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
D.
RFC 1939
RFC 1939 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Post Office Protocol version 3 (POP3) used for retrieving email from a mail server.
-
E.
RFC 9113
RFC 9113 is the Internet standards document that specifies the HTTP/2 protocol, defining its framing, semantics, and operational behavior on the web.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesFormat Context triple: [Best Current Practice, usesFormat, RFC]
-
A.
format
chosen
Indicates the specific arrangement, structure, or presentation style in which something is organized or expressed.
-
B.
usesStandard
Indicates that one entity adopts, follows, or operates according to a specified standard defined by another entity or reference.
-
C.
usesMatchesFrom
Indicates that one entity relies on or incorporates matches (e.g., pattern matches, rule matches, or result matches) produced by another entity or process.
-
D.
hasForm
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular shape, structure, or configuration.
-
E.
hasFullForm
Indicates that one entity is the complete, expanded, or unabbreviated form of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25853594c8190b05ec3a586ec88bf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e69a9248190b9e7959b43223baa |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a3914eba9081908cdef8b719c9b20b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b721180819080d43c43fcbccf87 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:57 a.m.