Triple
T270812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC |
E5627
|
entity |
| Predicate | publisher |
P29
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC Editor |
E35272
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC Editor | Statement: [RFC, publisher, RFC Editor]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC Editor Context triple: [RFC, publisher, RFC Editor]
-
A.
RFC Editor
chosen
The RFC Editor is the organization responsible for editing, publishing, and maintaining the Request for Comments (RFC) series that documents standards and technical notes for the Internet community.
-
B.
RFCs
RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
-
C.
RFC 9114
RFC 9114 is the Internet standard that specifies HTTP/3, the version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol that runs over the QUIC transport protocol.
-
D.
RFC 855
RFC 855 is an Internet standards document that specifies the Telnet protocol’s options and mechanisms for remote terminal communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
E.
RFC 9113
RFC 9113 is the Internet standards document that specifies the HTTP/2 protocol, defining its framing, semantics, and operational behavior on the web.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25853594c8190b05ec3a586ec88bf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25db17e8c8190a6ebcadd8a0abf4d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a3914eba9081908cdef8b719c9b20b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:57 a.m.