Triple
T270641
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Telnet |
E5624
|
entity |
| Predicate | recommendedUsage |
P7913
|
FINISHED |
| Object | only on trusted or isolated networks |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: only on trusted or isolated networks | Statement: [Telnet, recommendedUsage, only on trusted or isolated networks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recommendedUsage Context triple: [Telnet, recommendedUsage, only on trusted or isolated networks]
-
A.
usageType
Indicates the specific manner, purpose, or context in which something is used or intended to be used.
-
B.
eligibleUses
chosen
Indicates the types of actions, purposes, or contexts in which something is permitted or qualified to be used.
-
C.
usedWith
Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
-
D.
usedFor
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
E.
usedOn
Indicates that one entity is applied to, operated on, or otherwise utilized in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25853594c8190b05ec3a586ec88bf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e69a9248190b9e7959b43223baa |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b721180819080d43c43fcbccf87 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:57 a.m.