Triple

T27051621
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cheyenne’s Theme E684786 entity
Predicate hasRecurrentUse P47229 FINISHED
Object recurring leitmotif in film LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recurring leitmotif in film | Statement: [Cheyenne’s Theme, hasRecurrentUse, recurring leitmotif in film]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRecurrentUse
Context triple: [Cheyenne’s Theme, hasRecurrentUse, recurring leitmotif in film]
  • A. hasNumberOfUses
    Indicates the quantity of times something can be or is intended to be used.
  • B. usesRepetition chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs repeated elements, actions, or patterns as a deliberate feature or technique in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. continuouslyUsedAs
    Indicates that one entity is persistently and repeatedly employed or utilized as another entity or for a particular function over an extended, uninterrupted period.
  • D. hasDailyUse
    Indicates that something is used or occurs on a daily, regular basis.
  • E. enablesRepeatedUse
    Indicates that one entity provides the capability or conditions for another entity to be used multiple times without needing replacement or reset.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef14829fac8190914bef9ecc3005d7 completed April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe68a4b67881909ca1d9f276f922e0 completed May 8, 2026, 10:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe680234c88190b01f953987b74972 completed May 8, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:14 a.m.