Triple
T2698000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yancowinna County, New South Wales |
E58558
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | county of New South Wales |
C10613
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: county of New South Wales Context triple: [Yancowinna County, New South Wales, instanceOf, county of New South Wales]
-
A.
state of Australia
A state of Australia is a primary political and administrative division of the country, each with its own government, parliament, and constitution operating under the federal system of the Commonwealth of Australia.
-
B.
county of New Jersey
A county of New Jersey is a primary local government and administrative subdivision of the state, encompassing multiple municipalities and providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, and infrastructure management.
-
C.
Governor of New South Wales
The Governor of New South Wales is the King’s representative in the Australian state of New South Wales, performing constitutional, ceremonial, and community duties on behalf of the Crown.
-
D.
county of Pennsylvania
A county of Pennsylvania is an administrative and geographic subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that provides local government services, maintains public records, and serves as a jurisdictional unit for courts, elections, and taxation.
-
E.
county of New York State
A county of New York State is a primary local government and administrative subdivision of the state, responsible for regional services such as law enforcement, courts, record-keeping, and certain social and infrastructure functions for its constituent municipalities and residents.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac269e481909cb317d79e68b75b |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.