Triple
T2697352
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trial of Socrates |
E58542
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAccuser |
P15074
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Anytus |
E59089
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anytus | Statement: [Trial of Socrates, hasAccuser, Anytus]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Anytus Context triple: [Trial of Socrates, hasAccuser, Anytus]
-
A.
Anytus
chosen
Anytus was an influential Athenian politician and democratic leader best known for being one of the principal accusers in the trial that led to Socrates’ execution.
-
B.
Crites
Crites are small, carnivorous alien creatures known for their voracious appetites and mischievous, deadly behavior in the Critters horror-comedy film series.
-
C.
Κρίτων
Κρίτων is a Socratic dialogue by Plato in which Socrates discusses justice, obligation, and civil disobedience with his friend Crito while awaiting execution.
-
D.
Meletus
Meletus was the principal accuser who initiated the charges of impiety and corrupting the youth against Socrates in classical Athens.
-
E.
Polus
Polus is a young, ambitious rhetorician in Plato’s dialogue "Gorgias," often portrayed as an overconfident student of the sophist Gorgias.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac269e481909cb317d79e68b75b |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda322af48190833b8a3c006db236 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afaf6d9d9c81908c7c1bcdfb7810f0 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 5:43 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:55 p.m.