Triple
T2682933
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | equipartition theorem |
E57415
|
entity |
| Predicate | mathematicallyBasedOn |
P7125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | classical Hamiltonian mechanics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: classical Hamiltonian mechanics | Statement: [equipartition theorem, mathematicallyBasedOn, classical Hamiltonian mechanics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mathematicallyBasedOn Context triple: [equipartition theorem, mathematicallyBasedOn, classical Hamiltonian mechanics]
-
A.
isBasedOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity is derived from, inspired by, or developed using the content, structure, or principles of another entity.
-
B.
mathematicallyExpressedBy
Indicates that something (such as a concept, quantity, or relationship) is represented or captured using a specific mathematical expression or formulation.
-
C.
areBasedOn
Indicates that one entity is founded, derived, or developed from the principles, content, or structure of another entity.
-
D.
mathematicallyFormulatedBy
Indicates that something (such as a concept, model, or theory) is expressed or defined using mathematical formulations created by a particular agent.
-
E.
mathematicallyUses
Indicates that one entity employs or applies another entity within a mathematical context, such as in a formula, proof, computation, or theoretical framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a5028388190a36f3baf1588309e |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd9d602848190b638e417e710a555 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd81c9b4c81908e5e0da6ac5f828b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.