Triple

T2682402
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alabama v. Shelton E57401 entity
Predicate hasRelatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Argersinger v. Hamlin E58186 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Argersinger v. Hamlin | Statement: [Alabama v. Shelton, hasRelatedCase, Argersinger v. Hamlin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Argersinger v. Hamlin
Context triple: [Alabama v. Shelton, hasRelatedCase, Argersinger v. Hamlin]
  • A. Argersinger v. Hamlin chosen
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • B. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • C. Romer v. Evans
    Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
  • D. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Sherbert v. Verner
    Sherbert v. Verner is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened protections for religious liberty by requiring strict scrutiny of government actions that substantially burden individuals’ religious practices.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a5028388190a36f3baf1588309e completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd9d602848190b638e417e710a555 completed March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69afa06c7a908190ae3463bf3e204fa6 completed March 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.