Triple
T26809927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gardenia by Elizabeth Taylor |
E671959
|
entity |
| Predicate | dominantNote |
P168578
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gardenia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gardenia | Statement: [Gardenia by Elizabeth Taylor, dominantNote, gardenia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantNote Context triple: [Gardenia by Elizabeth Taylor, dominantNote, gardenia]
-
A.
subdominantKey
Indicates the musical key that functions as the subdominant (built on the fourth scale degree) in relation to a given tonic key.
-
B.
dominantTriad
Indicates that one entity forms the primary or controlling component within a three-part (triadic) relationship involving the other two entities.
-
C.
dominantMetreOf
Indicates that one metre (rhythmic pattern) is the primary or prevailing metrical structure used in another work, passage, or musical/poetic context.
-
D.
dominantComposition
Indicates that one entity is the primary or prevailing component, material, or element that makes up or characterizes another entity.
-
E.
dominantOn
Indicates that one entity exerts control, authority, or prevailing influence over another in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb3225a3c8190aaf6746efeded2f3 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67595fa7c8190b6e9f7a8c700dd97 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c2f81c8190bf369226306eef09 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f674df80b08190adb7f7531083bbb1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:28 a.m.