Triple

T2667293
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Debs v. United States E55665 entity
Predicate holding P2237 FINISHED
Object The First Amendment did not protect Debs’s antiwar speech under the circumstances of the case. E55665 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The First Amendment did not protect Debs’s antiwar speech under the circumstances of the case. | Statement: [Debs v. United States, holding, The First Amendment did not protect Debs’s antiwar speech under the circumstances of the case.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: The First Amendment did not protect Debs’s antiwar speech under the circumstances of the case.
Context triple: [Debs v. United States, holding, The First Amendment did not protect Debs’s antiwar speech under the circumstances of the case.]
  • A. The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
    The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case is the central holding of the 1919 Supreme Court decision Frohwerk v. United States, which upheld convictions for antiwar speech during World War I.
  • B. Debs v. United States chosen
    Debs v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which socialist leader Eugene V. Debs’s conviction for antiwar speech was upheld, reinforcing broad limits on free speech during wartime.
  • C. Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
  • D. In re Debs Supreme Court case
    In re Debs was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s authority to use injunctions and troops to end the Pullman Strike, significantly expanding federal power over labor disputes and interstate commerce.
  • E. Sedition Act of 1918
    The Sedition Act of 1918 was a World War I–era U.S. law that expanded restrictions on speech by criminalizing criticism of the government, the Constitution, the military, or the war effort.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab49e54de48190be708cd1cf8be073 completed March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd98a4ee88190aa7ef914e316ba31 completed March 7, 2026, 7:53 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69afa05b008881908049751b73e800d0 completed March 10, 2026, 4:38 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.