Triple
T2660174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mathews v. Eldridge |
E54707
|
entity |
| Predicate | distinguishedFrom |
P1612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Goldberg v. Kelly |
E54958
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Goldberg v. Kelly | Statement: [Mathews v. Eldridge, distinguishedFrom, Goldberg v. Kelly]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goldberg v. Kelly Context triple: [Mathews v. Eldridge, distinguishedFrom, Goldberg v. Kelly]
-
A.
Goldberg v. Kelly
chosen
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
B.
Rostker v. Goldberg
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
C.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49e028948190b97e01d73548b1d9 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd94f3b1881909bd36cfe61c254a5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afa056f478819091f6751edfee0132 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.