Triple
T26584732
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kansas elections |
E667175
|
entity |
| Predicate | voterDisqualification |
P10714
|
FINISHED |
| Object | certain felony convictions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: certain felony convictions | Statement: [Kansas elections, voterDisqualification, certain felony convictions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: voterDisqualification Context triple: [Kansas elections, voterDisqualification, certain felony convictions]
-
A.
disqualificationAuthority
Indicates the entity that has the power or official authority to disqualify another entity from a process, status, or participation.
-
B.
votingRestriction
Indicates that there is a rule or limitation affecting who can vote, how they can vote, or under what conditions voting is allowed.
-
C.
eligibleVoters
Indicates that the referenced entities are legally permitted and qualified to vote in a given election or jurisdiction.
-
D.
reasonForDisqualification
chosen
Indicates the specific cause or justification for which an entity was deemed ineligible or disqualified from consideration or participation.
-
E.
votersCouldRejectList
Indicates that voters have the option or authority to reject a proposed list (such as a candidate list or item list) rather than accept or select from it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfb7e548190b60a9031182f5a7e |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f614e47cdc81909786f92cc0d5965f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d7b1b0819095ddd3b5169f8ce2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:05 a.m.