Triple

T26530113
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MAS radiometer E670795 entity
Predicate hasSpectralRegion P7244 FINISHED
Object thermal infrared LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: thermal infrared | Statement: [MAS radiometer, hasSpectralRegion, thermal infrared]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpectralRegion
Context triple: [MAS radiometer, hasSpectralRegion, thermal infrared]
  • A. spectralRegion chosen
    Indicates the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., wavelength or frequency range) in which a measurement, observation, or property is defined or applies.
  • B. hasSpectralChannel
    Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific spectral channel or band within an electromagnetic spectrum.
  • C. spectrumContains
    Indicates that a given spectrum includes or exhibits a specified component, feature, or range within it.
  • D. hasSpectrumRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific role, function, or responsibility within a defined spectrum-related context or framework.
  • E. hasSpectralLines
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by specific spectral lines associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeb31ea1e08190b9ff43cf9bc25bf8 completed April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c49627908190b3553474c7c3072b completed May 3, 2026, 3:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6c3f23ae081909a52801266063a3c completed May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:35 a.m.