Triple

T264650
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GitHub E5697 entity
Predicate supportsProgrammingLanguages P1592 FINISHED
Object multiple programming languages LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multiple programming languages | Statement: [GitHub, supportsProgrammingLanguages, multiple programming languages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsProgrammingLanguages
Context triple: [GitHub, supportsProgrammingLanguages, multiple programming languages]
  • A. programmingLanguage chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to create, control, or interact with the other entity.
  • B. programming
    Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or modifies software or code, typically using a programming language to create or control computer programs.
  • C. supportsProjectType
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
  • D. languageFeature
    Indicates that one entity is a characteristic, property, or capability of a language associated with the other entity.
  • E. supportsFeature
    Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2587daeb081909591b9d30f80a271 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25d8f9bbc8190a13841e4de093a66 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b6e07748190834022a65ba6d803 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m.