Triple

T26399244
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 3164 E663653 entity
Predicate specifiesEncoding P7661 FINISHED
Object US-ASCII LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: US-ASCII | Statement: [RFC 3164, specifiesEncoding, US-ASCII]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: specifiesEncoding
Context triple: [RFC 3164, specifiesEncoding, US-ASCII]
  • A. localEncoding
    Indicates that an entity is represented or stored using a specific encoding scheme that is defined or applied locally within a particular context or system.
  • B. requestEncoding
    Indicates that one entity asks another to use or provide a specific encoding format for data or communication.
  • C. UTF16Encoding
    Indicates that a text value is encoded using the UTF-16 character encoding scheme, defining how its characters are represented as 16-bit code units.
  • D. encodedInUnicodeSince
    Indicates that a given character or symbol has been included and assigned a code point in the Unicode standard starting from a specific version or time.
  • E. usesCharacterSet chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a specific character set defined by another entity for encoding or representing text.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee883823988190b418b111be28a44a completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d completed May 2, 2026, 8 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:30 p.m.