Triple
T2639658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Surat |
E62832
|
entity |
| Predicate | colonialPowerPresence |
P3075
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Portuguese |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Portuguese | Statement: [Surat, colonialPowerPresence, Portuguese]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colonialPowerPresence Context triple: [Surat, colonialPowerPresence, Portuguese]
-
A.
colonialPowerInvolved
Indicates that a colonial power is involved in, influences, or exerts control over the referenced situation, event, or relationship.
-
B.
colonialPowerOfOrigin
Indicates the colonial state or empire from which a colony or formerly colonized territory originated or was governed.
-
C.
wasColonialPower
chosen
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control or dominance over another entity.
-
D.
usedByColonialPower
Indicates that something is employed or exploited as a tool, resource, or mechanism by a colonial power in the context of domination or control.
-
E.
colonialPowerOpposed
Indicates that one colonial power actively resisted, conflicted with, or worked against another colonial power or its interests.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c3f2dcc819082df80f5e032f690 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd8fafad08190939b08558fea6abd |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd812849881908f956845a80e0205 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.