Triple
T26360680
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | La La Falls walking track |
E660193
|
entity |
| Predicate | managementArea |
P82959
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yarra Ranges region |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yarra Ranges region | Statement: [La La Falls walking track, managementArea, Yarra Ranges region]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managementArea Context triple: [La La Falls walking track, managementArea, Yarra Ranges region]
-
A.
hasManagementArea
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing, overseeing, or administering a specified area or region.
-
B.
governanceArea
Indicates the geographic or jurisdictional area over which an entity has governing authority or responsibility.
-
C.
managementIs
Indicates that one entity holds a managerial role, responsibility, or authority over another entity.
-
D.
oversawArea
Indicates that one entity had supervisory or managerial responsibility over a particular area, region, or domain associated with another entity.
-
E.
ministryArea
Indicates that one entity is the geographic or administrative area over which a ministry or ministerial body has responsibility or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee8126d52c8190bc0b34337c2c9aa8 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66c5c13808190887180099745673b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66abddc448190a488852f8abdeb2c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:51 p.m.