Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: United States v. Butler | Statement: [AAA, declaredUnconstitutionalInCase, United States v. Butler]

Target entity: United States v. Butler
Context triple: [AAA, declaredUnconstitutionalInCase, United States v. Butler]

• A. United States v. Butler chosen
  United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
• B. Wickard v. Filburn
  Wickard v. Filburn is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded federal regulatory power by holding that even purely local, non-commercial activity could be regulated under the Commerce Clause if it had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
• C. United States v. Darby
  United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
• D. Katzenbach v. McClung
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• E. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
  Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal by limiting federal power under the Commerce Clause and declaring the National Industrial Recovery Act unconstitutional.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Context triple: [AAA, declaredUnconstitutionalInCase, United States v. Butler]

• A. constitutionalChallenge
  Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
• B. constitutionalCitation
  Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
• C. concurringJustice
  Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
• D. dissentingJustice
  Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
• E. constitutionalProvisionInterpreted
  Indicates that a specific constitutional provision has been interpreted or given meaning by a judicial or authoritative body in relation to a particular context or case.
• F. None of above. chosen