Triple
T26340218
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Operation Atilla |
E662624
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasisClaimedByTurkey |
P87474
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Treaty of Guarantee |
E662625
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Treaty of Guarantee | Statement: [Operation Atilla, legalBasisClaimedByTurkey, Treaty of Guarantee]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalBasisClaimedByTurkey Context triple: [Operation Atilla, legalBasisClaimedByTurkey, Treaty of Guarantee]
-
A.
legalRationaleClaimedByTurkey
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal rationale is asserted or invoked by Turkey as the basis for its position or actions.
-
B.
statusInTurkey
Indicates the legal, social, or official condition or standing that an entity holds within the context of Turkey.
-
C.
confederationOfTurkey
Indicates that one entity is a confederation composed of, or politically uniting, the entity Turkey.
-
D.
resultForTurkey
Indicates that something is the outcome, consequence, or result specifically associated with Turkey.
-
E.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee81304194819092e20e0fae3aee07 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f739a638748190808e7a2930dce16e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a119a5ddb8481909bc2c4b37fa01d85 |
completed | May 23, 2026, 12:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f732f2dc6c8190a4e86da98cc5eb05 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:38 p.m.