Triple

T26333613
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zilog Z8000 E662458 entity
Predicate supportsPrivilegeLevels P196579 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Zilog Z8000, supportsPrivilegeLevels, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsPrivilegeLevels
Context triple: [Zilog Z8000, supportsPrivilegeLevels, true]
  • A. securityLevelsInclude
    Indicates that one entity’s defined security levels contain or encompass the security levels of another entity.
  • B. requiresPrivileges
    Indicates that performing the referenced action or accessing the referenced resource is contingent on the actor having specific privileges or permissions.
  • C. supportsACLs
    Indicates that one entity provides or is compatible with access control lists (ACLs) for managing permissions on another entity.
  • D. holderPrivileges
    Indicates that one entity possesses specific rights, permissions, or advantages granted to the holder of another entity.
  • E. entailsPrivileges
    Indicates that one entity’s status, action, or condition grants or carries with it specific rights, powers, or privileges for another entity or itself.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812f32748190871d970c4e2a8ddf completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe5d58c3e48190910aa3c23485e2c4 completed May 8, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe5c92090c8190bcfa412c0a3619df completed May 8, 2026, 9:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe5d580d7c819097cb18d438b01d08 completed May 8, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:35 p.m.