Triple

T26329344
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Syracuse Police Department E662337 entity
Predicate hasSwornType P160252 FINISHED
Object police sergeant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: police sergeant | Statement: [Syracuse Police Department, hasSwornType, police sergeant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSwornType
Context triple: [Syracuse Police Department, hasSwornType, police sergeant]
  • A. hasSwornType chosen
    Indicates that one entity has formally pledged or committed to a specific type, category, or classification of something.
  • B. hasSwornStatus
    Indicates that an entity is formally bound by an oath or sworn commitment, reflecting an official or pledged status in relation to another entity or role.
  • C. hasOathTo
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is bound by an oath or sworn commitment to another entity.
  • D. oathSwornBefore
    Indicates that an oath or solemn promise has been formally declared in the presence of a specified person, group, or authority.
  • E. swornInOn
    Indicates that an individual formally assumes an office, role, or duty by taking an official oath on a specified date, occasion, or object.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812f32748190871d970c4e2a8ddf completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60f67cde08190b9bfe877342778eb completed May 2, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f602d2ec748190ae95154f34c7878f completed May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:32 p.m.