Triple

T2632453
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Western Georgia E59664 entity
Predicate hasRegionalLanguage P2982 FINISHED
Object Svan language E57216 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Svan language | Statement: [Western Georgia, hasRegionalLanguage, Svan language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Svan language
Context triple: [Western Georgia, hasRegionalLanguage, Svan language]
  • A. Svan language chosen
    Svan language is a highly conservative and endangered Kartvelian language spoken by the Svan people in the Svaneti region of northwestern Georgia.
  • B. Kodava language
    Kodava language is a Dravidian language spoken primarily by the Kodava (Coorg) community in the Kodagu district of Karnataka, India.
  • C. Lule Sami language
    Lule Sami language is a Uralic, Sami language spoken primarily in parts of northern Norway and Sweden by the Lule Sámi people.
  • D. Sabine language
    The Sabine language was an extinct Italic tongue once spoken by the ancient Sabine people of central Italy, closely related to other Osco-Umbrian languages.
  • E. Isnag language
    The Isnag language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Isnag people in the northern Cordillera region of Luzon in the Philippines.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac8596c8190b34997e73d9e991c completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd8c8d32c819081fc89b91217ed54 completed March 7, 2026, 7:50 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69af90a996188190b3a83a31e69d09ef completed March 10, 2026, 3:31 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.