Triple

T263200
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Historical Village Museum E5796 entity
Predicate hasLanguageOfSignage P4196 FINISHED
Object English LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Historical Village Museum, hasLanguageOfSignage, English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageOfSignage
Context triple: [Historical Village Museum, hasLanguageOfSignage, English]
  • A. languageOfSignage chosen
    Indicates the language used on signs or written displays associated with an entity.
  • B. hasSignage
    Indicates that appropriate signs or visual markers are present to convey information, directions, warnings, or identification related to the associated entity.
  • C. hasSignificantLanguage
    Indicates that an entity possesses a language that plays an important or primary role in its communication, identity, or functioning.
  • D. emblemLanguage
    Indicates that an emblem (such as a symbol or logo) is associated with or presented in a particular language.
  • E. isLanguageOf
    Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a258dd8ea08190ac554a1cc8dfd8c3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25d8c7f448190af9145256f994177 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b6e07748190834022a65ba6d803 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m.